I really didn't mean to divert this into all the listed topics, but anyways.
On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 12:09:42PM -0400, Travis Bemann wrote: > On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 11:44:44PM +0700, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > That is my personal preference too, but many things are my personal > > preference that just can't happen. There are a lot things I keep hearing > > we must do: > > > > - we must have some form micro payment system > > NO, NO, NO! We have to keep capitalism from corrupting Freenet as > much as possible. If it were possible to do right it would be good. It will be hard to justify asking people to give up there bandwidth for free. > > - we must get perfect anonymity > > Therefore, we must be quite paranoid when designing Freenet (which > very well may require out of band communication). We should use PK > encryption for connections, out of band initial key exchange, > automatically obfuscating file lengths, encrypted datastores on > machines with encrypted swap partitions, etc. That is still not perfect anonymity. <> > > - we must have links rated by capacity > > This is something that can be programmed into nodes without affecting > the protocol itself. Just have nodes record the average connection > speed with other nodes. Your still not understanding Freenet, Travis. Nodes cannot just route at the leisure, it will kill the network if they do. > -- > Travis Bemann > Sendmail is still screwed up on my box. > My email address is really bemann at execpc.com. -- \oskar _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
