> Redirect > Redirect-to=freenet:CHK at klasdfadsfldsfdfjsdf > Multipart > Part-count=10 > Part-1=freenet:CHK at asdlfldsfhsadfraewf > Part-2=freenet:CHK at alsdfhjsdfadfkdsfj
I don't like simply putting the content-carrying fields in the metadata because they're not metadata, they're content. In a sense they're metadata about some other thing in Freenet, but the way I look at it, the private metadata should contain metadata about the included file. Of course you can say if there is no file, then the metadata must be referring to some other file. But I don't see why this is better than just having it uniform. You avoid possible namespace collisions between metadata about the file itself and metadata about the file it is referring to. And it just seems cleaner to me. Examples: Redirect Signature=312798432109813209813298012 Data freenet:CHK at klasdfadsfldsfdfjsdf Multipart Count=2 Encoding=RAID0 Author=Brandon Title=72 Naked Cryptographers in Vienna Data freenet:CHK at asdlfldsfhsadfraewf freenet:CHK at alsdfhjsdfadfkdsfj Index Signature=980439804309843098 Title=Philosophical texts Author=Automated philosophical text indexing bot Count=3 Data Art of War=freenet:CHK at asdlfldfklsdioeipopiopiofspio The Prince=freenet:CHK at ioioioioioioioioiooiioioioioi Leviathan=freenet:CHK at jkdkjfdjklfdkljfsdkljfsdkljfs These all have the same format as a "normal" file: Normal Author=Brandon Content-type=image/gif Title=picture of a monkey Data <a bunch of binary gibberish representing a gif file> _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
