> I don't know what how many other keytypes need be supported. CHK's are > content-verified and SSK's are sender-verified. That's all I need. KSK's > suck IMHO. SVKs are really just more primitive SSKs that "hold" only one > file. Why support them? Or, who will use them. That's the question.
Well I suppose if you're just making a client for you. If you're making a client for people to use, you need to support KSKs since that's the (0.3 analog to the) current most popular key type. > freenet:SSK at bakunin-0.2.2.tar.gz,oNOwzscVwsgmAUsofeZKSvjG3SACAQ ! I'm glad you're distributing via Freenet. I wish all Freenet developers distributed their stuff through Freenet. _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
