You mean compared to running a server that doesn't have a port at all? You're right it would be pretty damn hard to remove the (nonexistant) traffic of that server...
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 01:07:36PM -0500, Signal 11 wrote: > > > that's bad, indeed. why not makeing the node refuse to start whithout > > a port defined? > > By setting a port, keep in mind it becomes orders of magnitude easier > to locate and remove (or filter) freenet traffic. > > ~ Signal 11 > > _______________________________________________ > Freenet-dev mailing list > Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev > -- \oskar _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
