32 hops to cover a test5 network completely is correct.
Every node sends the message to the 4 others, and every such send leads to one
decrement forward, and one back. 4*4*2 = 32.
On Fri, 12 May 2000, Bill Trost wrote:
> Oskar Sandberg writes:
> On Fri, 12 May 2000, Bill Trost wrote:
> > As things stand, this RequestFailed has the bizarre property that
> > its HopsToLive is *larger* than the RequestFailed that the node
> > just received...
>
> This is definitely wrong.
>
> Yup. Never mind, I misunderstood the code. RequestFailed's *do* get
> forwarded after all, apparently.
>
> That means that a client inserting a DataRequest with a HopsToLive
> of 6 into a test5 network should eventually get a TimedOut
> response, not the expected(?) RequestFailed, if I understand the
> code correctly *now*. I can't test it against the current node
> ("RawMessage.java:Error:Stream died while reading message of
> type: H??\??1[|5??o??????w????@????eAv????C"), but that is the behavior
> I get with the last beta release.
>
> Surprisingly, a HopsToLive of 31 (but not 32) *also* results in a
> TimedOut. It looks as though sending a request that results in an
> immediate RequestFailed counts as a "hop" for that request.
> I don't know if this is "right" or not...
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freenet-dev mailing list
> Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
--
Oskar Sandberg
md98-osa at nada.kth.se
#!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)
_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
