-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > > No, you'd have generic code that handles the parsing and unstanding of > your type file. Adding new types is simply a matter of adding a new entry > to that file. Exactly... Types aren't supposed to change. Having new types means breaking old programs. You're going way overboard here.
> > Doing it this way makes it more general. You could put in rules for > comparisions of generalized types. <shudder> > ie record 1 is older than record 2 if record1's date is > record2's date > or record1's date = record2's date and record1's time > record2's time. And you can't do this with integers? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE5IGsopXyM95IyRhURAmbFAKCOVNxfPl3ajwCivjwpc7xh1+HKywCbBgJF onOIoY/BdWjASn/Z1/dbgew= =TixB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
