> > Seriously! I've shown examples of the appearance of a weak-typed > protocol. It looks virtually indistinguishable from an untyped one. In > fact, code can treat it as a "string only" system and do lazy parsing as > it does now. But at the same time apps that don't want to memorize FNP > don't have to.
Maybe I've missed your examples. Can you point me to them or perhaps repost them to this newly titled thread? -- Lee Daniel Crocker <lee at piclab.com> <http://www.piclab.com/lee/> "All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past, are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
