> Of course it is activated. That is why people who are running nodes should be > running the 0.2 release for now. We have more protocol changes ahead.
Hmmm, we should take more care to warn people when the current CVS code goes out of sync with the most recent release (such as a news update and an email to the announce list), and attempt to get a new release out there ASAP which reflect the changes. As a precaution I will temporarily remove links to current snapshots and such like. I acknowledge that sometimes non-backward compatible changes are required, but we need a better strategy for making significant changes of this type which doesn't stop everything from working! I know that many people think that we shouldn't worry about the user experience at this stage since we are still in development, however we disregard our "public" at our peril, an elitist attitude would be very dangerous. If people don't use Freenet, and don't remain interested in Freenet development, it won't matter a damn how well it works or how clever it is. I make no apology for pushing for the Freenet development process to remain as open as possible, and for the software to be as easy to try out as possible at all times. Ian. _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
