Adam Langley <agl at linuxpower.org> writes: > Yes, but if we then we loose the ability to give out a freenet:CHK@ > key and include metadata. You can put metadata in another document > and include a second routing key in the key. This leads to > duplication of metadata if it's in a DocInfo and a separate > document.
You could always just list both the SSK and the CHK, for verification. > But you're then moving from something like: > > WaitRedirect > ... > EndMessage > Info > ... > EndMessage > > to > > DocInfo > Command=WaitRedirect > Command.Arg.URI=.. > Metadata.... > ... > EndMessage > > that's looks like a step backwards. I'm not sure it is. The first way, I have to associate the WaitRedirect command and the Info command by noticing that they have the same docname. The second way, I *know* they're related, because they're packaged together. That seems like it's a valuable addition. Programs that want to move metadata around can confidently grab DocInfo commands without parsing their content, and know that they have all of the information pertaining to a particular document. -S _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From devl-admin at freenetproject.org Sat Apr 7 14:59:49 2001 Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org> Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11]) by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA05731 for <danello at danky.com>; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 14:59:45 -0400 Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C91058037; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 11:42:04 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: devl at freenetproject.org Received: from priss.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us (priss.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us [216.103.68.5]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B33E57D9C for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 11:41:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from evan by priss.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14lxZK-0004uJ-00 for <devl at freenetproject.org>; Sat, 07 Apr 2001 11:36:18 -0700 To: devl at freenetproject.org Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] KeyIndexClient -- date-basing References: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0104061746190.26726-100000 at moe.cc.utexas.edu> <003301c0bf5a$e68b3ae0$0200000a at pete> From: "Mr.Bad" <[email protected]> Organization: Pigdog Journal X-PGP-Fingerprint: 91F8 6B2D EBEA 8D7A 3F20 E5B0 6D97 B3BC F498 A1D9 In-Reply-To: <003301c0bf5a$e68b3ae0$0200000a at pete> Message-ID: <874rw0tv4t.fsf at priss.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: devl-admin at freenetproject.org Errors-To: devl-admin at freenetproject.org X-BeenThere: devl at freenetproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.3 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: devl at freenetproject.org List-Help: <mailto:devl-request at freenetproject.org?subject=help> List-Post: <mailto:devl at freenetproject.org> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl>, <mailto:devl-request at freenetproject.org?subject=subscribe> List-Id: Discussion of information related to Freenet development <devl.freenetproject.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl>, <mailto:devl-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/> Date: 07 Apr 2001 11:36:18 -0700 Status: RO Content-Length: 1353 Lines: 29 X-Mozilla-Status: 8011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 >>>>> "SR" == Stefan Reich <doc at drjava.de> writes: SR> Superb! Is this scheduled for 0.3.8.2? Yes, it is now. SR> Do I have to wait until that version is released before I can SR> tell people to insert into my key indices? I guess they can do SR> it today when construct the date part manually. I could SR> generate the current date via PHP and announce it my site... GAR! Why not just let them do it the regular way! Leave off the dates until 0.3.8.2 comes out. YOU ARE GOING TO FUCK UP KEY INDEXING IF YOU INSIST ON COMPLICATING IT. "Key indexing? That's a pain in the
