Adam Langley <agl at linuxpower.org> writes: > But how do we give out CHKs then? We can't really point to a way to > get the DMI (what I'm calling "Real Metadata", Dublin Core stuff > because we don't have another name for it). Or do we say that you > only link DMI to a CHK thru a DocInfo?
That's what I'm suggesting. Including actual metadata with the CHK seems to be a bad plan. > I'm not clued up on this problem. (I read the threads again). Whats > wrong with a list of Redirect, Info pairs? Nothing, I just want to pull the pairs into a single command, if it's reasonable to do so. > Also pairs of messages mean that we can cleanly replace it with a > WaitRedirect (or whatever). I think we can still do that. Since all a Redirect provides is a URI and a docname, WaitRedirect, etc, can be moved from optional commands to optional fields. -S _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
