On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 01:18:31AM +0200, David Levy wrote: > i'v just read this : > from http://www.webreview.com/pi/2000/05_12_00.shtml
The whole "You can't trust anonymous information" argument is simply wrong. In Freenet it is possible, through "subspaces", to create anonymous pseudonyms which people can learn to trust over time, without ever finding out the true identity of the author. Consider this, how many people trust what is written in the New York Times, yet how many people know the identiy of the editor who is essentially responsible for the reliability of the information in it? Ian. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010406/870610d5/attachment.pgp>
