On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 03:55:31AM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote: > On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 09:56:22PM -0400, Peter Todd wrote: > > Remember: Friends don't let friends use KSK's. > > Then why are they part of Freenet?
Because dispite the fact that they are very insecure they are convienient. And sometimes the convinence outweights the total lack of security. Without KSK's freenet wouldn't be as popular as it is. Just look at the amount of data getting inserted onto Freenet as KSK's. -- GCS d s+:-- a--- C++++ UL++++ P L+++ E W++ N- o K- w-- O- M V- PS+ PE+ Y+ PGP+++ t 5 X R+ tv-- b+ DI+ D++ G e- h! r-- y-- pete at petertodd.ca http://retep.tripod.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010407/0a215110/attachment.pgp>
