On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 07:45:13PM -0500, Steven Hazel wrote: > Tavin Cole <tavin at mailandnews.com> writes: > > > And because they are a client side trick for making an SVK. Freenet > > itself only sees SVKs, SSKs, and CHKs. > > SSKs are also a subset of SVKs.
Hmm.. i was looking at the byte ids for keytypes and yes, SSK would have the same byte id as SVK (0x0201), while KSK actually gets its own byte id (0x0202). I would have expected KSKs to be identified and treated exactly the same as an SVK, down to the byte id, making them a purely client side abstraction. But they are in fact recognized specifically by the network.. seems odd. -- # tavin cole # if code is law, then Freenet is a crowded theater _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From devl-admin at freenetproject.org Sat Apr 7 21:29:49 2001 Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org> Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11]) by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA07393
