> What is the point of this proposal. What problem does it solve? A good > proposal should state the problem, then the solution, and then have > examples.
Perhaps I wasn't clear enough in my proposal. I was hoping that some of its benefits would be self-evident. Apparently not, so I'll try to explain things a little better: Consider the current in-freenet keyindex mechanism. The simplest way to use it is to adopt a simple identifier. I could adopt the identifier "index" as my own, accepting submissions under "index-SID", where SID is a number in a sequence. One problem with such a simple scheme is that the index might grow very large. This will certainly be the case when a
