> >From a programmer's or power user's point of view, James and Sebastion are > totally right. > But from a marketing/PR point of view, I argue that the 'Standard/Lite' > convention makes more sense. > > I'd appreciate a ruling from the project admins on this one.
I don't think we need to label them with these glib labels at all. The download section currently says this: Windows Windows installer (best option) Zip file In the future it should say: Windows Windows installer with Java runtime (use this if you don't have Java) Windows installer without Java runtime (use this if you're upgrading) Zip file (doesn't include Java runtime) If programmers are argueing over the meanings of Standard, Lite, and Complete, then users are bound to be confused as to which version they want. So it's best to just eschew labels and tell them which one they want. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From - Sat Apr 21 18:03:44 2001 Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org> Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11]) by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA32736 for <danello at danky.com>; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 19:39:00 -0400 Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6B55808D; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 16:20:07 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: devl at freenetproject.org Received: from post.webmailer.de (natmail2.webmailer.de [192.67.198.65])
