On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 06:10:06PM -0500, Brandon wrote: > > > >From a programmer's or power user's point of view, James and Sebastion are > > totally right. > > But from a marketing/PR point of view, I argue that the 'Standard/Lite' > > convention makes more sense. > > > > I'd appreciate a ruling from the project admins on this one. > > I don't think we need to label them with these glib labels at all. > > The download section currently says this: > Windows > Windows installer (best option) > Zip file > > In the future it should say: > Windows > Windows installer with Java runtime (use this if you don't have Java) > Windows installer without Java runtime (use this if you're upgrading) > Zip file (doesn't include Java runtime) > > If programmers are argueing over the meanings of Standard, Lite, and > Complete, then users are bound to be confused as to which version they > want. So it's best to just eschew labels and tell them which one they want.
Also include some pointer to how to determine if the JRE is installed. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010421/0f89f0bf/attachment.pgp>
