On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Brandon wrote: > > > version .3X. A quick hack would be to create a couple of XML Presentation > > classes (see presentation/FreenetProtocol.java and > > presentation/FNPRawMessage.java) and bind these to a localhost Listener > > port in Core. > > I don't see any advantage to having an XML presentation layer. However, it > would be really great if someone implemented this as it would be a test of > whether we can really have pluggable presentation layers.
We don't ATM. We support replacement presentation layers, but there is no structure in place, not even in the experimental 0.4 (which has a much better architecture regarding that stuff in general) supports several presentations at once (I considered it, but decided it was not worth the bother atm). > > The FNP over HTTP would be neat to have though. A paranoid Core could > > layer a Stego Input/OutputSteam over it and it would be difficult to tell > > Freenet traffic from any other HTTP traffic. > > Yes, I'm very into the idea of having an HTTP transport layer. An e-mail > transport layer would also be very nice to have. It would also be a nice > test to see if we can really have pluggable transportation layers. Maybe someday, but this is not the time for that sort of playing around. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://www.uprizer.com/mailman/listinfo/devl > _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://www.uprizer.com/mailman/listinfo/devl
