Mr.Bad <mr.bad at pigdog.org> writes:

> Hrm. Actually, that's perfectly normal.
> 
> HOWEVER, would it make sense to start reaping unused threads? Like,
> have a parameter, something like maxIdleThreads, so that if a thread
> is reclaim()'d and there are already maxIdleThreads around, go ahead
> and kill it.

Probably a good idea.  I don't know yet but before I updated cvs this
morning to pick up the ThreadPool changes the second box I was
mentioning earlier was up to 252 java processes and I was not being
allowed to fork any new processes.  We'll see if the new fixes get rid
of that situation.

  Kirk
--
Kirk Reiser                             The Computer Braille Facility
e-mail: kirk at braille.uwo.ca          University of Western Ontario
phone: (519) 661-3061

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://www.uprizer.com/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to