Does it do this without using fproxy? I find it quite a bit more likely that fproxy would leak threads than anything in Fred.
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 10:42:27AM -0500, Kirk Reiser wrote: > Actually, it is pretty easy to reproduce. Go into your favourite > browser and access some freenet pages through fproxy. It will go up a > little bit, processes that is, but will go up quite a bit on any > failed requests. I am up to 46 processes on one machine and 147 on > the other. > > fproxy should have a configuration option in the .fproxyrc file to set > htl. The default of five certainly creates a lot of failures on the > freenet currently. I can't even get pages from my first machine > reliably from the second. > > Kirk > > -- > > Kirk Reiser The Computer Braille Facility > e-mail: kirk at braille.uwo.ca University of Western Ontario > phone: (519) 661-3061 > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://www.uprizer.com/mailman/listinfo/devl > -- grocers getty or mill -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010223/d9e39341/attachment.pgp>
