Taral wrote >The only information available[1] in a freenet >conversation is timing and size information. You'd have to be pretty >good to fingerprint a freenet conversation with that... >If you want improved security, we can add padding systems to thwart the >timing- and size-based detection. Putting SSH or SSL on things will NOT >help matters. Add it please ! I'm willing to help you. A lot of people may need an option for freenet to be completely not detectable by sniffing IP packets. But what about the handshake ? And what if no other common protocol looks like freenet ? Then it may become detectable with the right tools. I was talking about adding SSL tunneling only for people who need/want it. It should be easy to do and won't cost much to the others. We could also try to imitate an SSL session, though not using SSL at all.
-- Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://www.uprizer.com/mailman/listinfo/devl
