On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 07:15:52PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 07:57:58PM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote: > > Fproxy should just support https instead of http. Browsers are pretty > > good about warning you when a page tries to load something from a > > different server or over a non-https protocol. > > While the unnescessary encryption-decryption is irritating, I tend to > agree.
We could at least wait until fproxy doesn't use an encrypted protocol to speak to the node. Having this happen locally: Encrypt-decrypt-encrypt-decrypt-encrypt-decrypt-encrypt-decrypt-encrypt-decrypt ssl ssl fnp fnp fnp fnp fnp fnp ssl ssl browser fproxy fproxy node node node node fproxy fproxy browser seems a little silly (and people wonder why Freenet is slow...) -- 'DeCSS would be fine. Where is it?' 'Here,' Montag touched his head. 'Ah,' Granger smiled and nodded. Oskar Sandberg oskar at freenetproject.org _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
