> Where are you getting the idea that whatever observed slowness is due to > fproxy being written in Java? > Competition is always good. But I don't think the speed boost you're > assuming you'll obtain is really there..
On my system, FProxy can't stream MP3s. FwProxy (written in C) streams them beautifully. QED. David ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tavin Cole" <[email protected]> To: <devl at freenetproject.org> Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2001 19:28 Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] FProxy must die^H^H^Hget fixed! > On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 02:53:07PM +1200, David McNab wrote: > > Seriously though - I'll have a look, but I'm a bit sceptical about the > > feasibility ot getting the required speed in a Java FProxy implementation. > > Maybe some hard-assed coding decisions might result in being able to stream > > MP3s (on a fine day, with the tongue angled 15 degress upward out the left > > of the mouth, and no other processes running), but then again, maybe not. As > > for MPEG streaming, I don't hold much hope. > > Where are you getting the idea that whatever observed slowness is due to > fproxy being written in Java? My suspects are 1) slow network and > 2) the fact that currently fproxy, even though it runs in the node, > makes an FNP connection to the node to do requests. > > > Again, I propose, what do people think of a portable C (yeh - straight C) > > FProxy implementation? > > Competition is always good. But I don't think the speed boost you're > assuming you'll obtain is really there.. > > -- > > # tavin cole > # > # "Technology is a way of organizing the universe so that > # man doesn't have to experience it." > # > # - Max Frisch > > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl > _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
