On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 10:29:44PM +0100, Theodore Hong wrote: > Oskar Sandberg <oskar at freenetproject.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 12:15:55AM +1200, David McNab wrote: > > > > Where are you getting the idea that whatever observed slowness is due to > > > > fproxy being written in Java? > > > > > > On my system, FProxy can't stream MP3s. > > > FwProxy (written in C) streams them beautifully. > > > > Maybe FwProxy does not handle all data by copying it into memory as an > > array of Strings, then into an array of byte arrays, then into one long > > byte array, then onto the user socket... > > I have to say I don't know why you have conceived this obsessive hatred of > fproxy. First, the mumail stuff only happens on insert, not request, so it > has absolutely no bearing on fproxy's ability or lack thereof to stream > mp3s. (Anyway, I didn't even write that code.)
I didn't name this thread, and I don't have an obsessive hatred of it, I just didn't like a lot of what I saw inside there. You have to admit that the HTTP implementation could have been better (doing > /dev/null with all the options just rubs me the wrong way). > Second, the encrypt/decrypt cycle you're complaining about isn't new to > fproxy, but goes all the way back to the original design of InsertClient > and RequestClient as lightweight nodes instead of a client > protocol/interface. Did I say otherwise? -- 'DeCSS would be fine. Where is it?' 'Here,' Montag touched his head. 'Ah,' Granger smiled and nodded. Oskar Sandberg oskar at freenetproject.org _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
