On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 10:31:41AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > I think that what is needed here is some kind of management interface to > the node. This should be password protected (password specificed in > .fproxyrc and functionality disabled unless it is). It could support > multiple connections, and also support the shutdown request > functionality we have discussed before. Commands could include: > > List outstanding MessageCallbacks > Print message log > Output datastore diagnostics > Shutdown > Write datastore > Print <plugin> log (ie. plugin=fproxy)
Current plans for whiterose are that the FCP interface accepts FNP encrypted connections and allows extra admin commands to be sent if the fingerprint is good. AGL -- Don't believe everything you hear or anything you say. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 240 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010626/381cbc0b/attachment.pgp>
