On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 09:29:15PM -0500, thelema wrote: > > Inserting large files is pointless anyway until we get redundant > > splitfiles (see GJ's freesite for why). > > > Weren't you one of the people insisting that we wouldn't need redundancy > for splitfiles?
I changed my mind - would you prefer that I stick to a viewpoint that I have discovered is incorrect? > Why does having something published in freenet change your mind about > this topic? It is nothing to do with having something published in Freenet, it is the simple mathematics of it. See GJs freesite. > That's still going to be a centralized approach. As much as I like the > idea as a stopgap measure, I'd prefer to have it only give one address > per request or something like that to severly limit any usefulness in > getting a list of all nodes in the network. Not nescessarily, thousands of people can place their seed.ref files on their websites, and have them updated daily. Hardly a centralized approach. Ian. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20011009/160abf47/attachment.pgp>
