Yeah, we probably can. > > Well, Fred still has support for both, it was just a question of > default. I do think we can deprecate Twofish now though. > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 07:48:26AM -0700, Scott G. Miller wrote: > > Originally the idea was to force third party implementers to implement > > both Rijndael and Twofish because we werent sure which would become > > AES. Its still wise to implement with Cipher agnosticity, but its less of > > an issue. > > > > > I never saw the point of using a different cipher for data encryption > > > then we do elsewhere. Rijndael is AES, Twofish will continue to grow > > > more obscure. > > > -- > > Oskar Sandberg > oskar at freenetproject.org > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
-- grocer melt gyro list -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20011015/ff33bff2/attachment.pgp>
