On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Thomas Leske wrote:
> fish wrote:
> >>Also, how does the fact that this "defeats the purpose of implenting
> >>updatable keys" make it "no better than most of the ideas going around for
> >>editions right now"?
> >
> > I am forced to assume that you incorrectly phrased the question. either
> > that, or you havn't tried to run a freesite ;). But I will answer it with
> > aquestion:
> >
> > what's different about TRK's to progressivly checking each previous time
> > periods DBR url if today's isn't found?
>
> All the unsuccessful requests for the old DBRs would go the full HTL.
> A TRK just takes a single request that goes the full HTL, even if the
> site was not updated in months.
>
> This is not really expensive: On the latest version of an edition based site
> the image link to the next edition causes an unsuccessful request. One could
> get rid of that with TRKs.
okay, yes I agree that this would be an improvment over DBR's
then. thanks for the explanation ;).
apologies for being so fucking slow ^_^
- fish in the big blue house
_______________________________________________
devl mailing list
devl at freenetproject.org
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
