Jeff Teitel <jeff at teitel.net> writes: > Edgar Friendly wrote: > > > As for changing this to try to take into account what the node > > percieves as its specialization, I will insist on the inherent > > wrongness of any such procedure and leave it at that. > > I don't understand why this is inherently wrong. I presume the > "histogram of keys in the local datastore" available in the nodestatus > servlet represents the specialization of keys on the local node. Why > not use it? > And I assert that any presumptions the node makes about what other nodes believe its specialization is are inherently flawed.
> > one could include the most popular data from your node, but BOTWFRW > > (because of the way freenet routing works), that data is unlikely to > > be requested of another random node. > > > Which is why I suggested adding some sort of randomness to it. > > Jeff Teitel Moving data around randomly will not help freenet. There's just too much data for it to even have a chance. Thelema -- E-mail: thelema314 at swbell.net Raabu and Piisu GPG 1024D/36352AAB fpr:756D F615 B4F3 BFFC 02C7 84B7 D8D7 6ECE 3635 2AAB _______________________________________________ devl mailing list devl at freenetproject.org http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
