On 15 Dec 2002, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> Ian Clarke <ian at freenetproject.org> writes:
> > My point is, all we need to do is a search-replace on this patch, and we
> > can *avoid* breaking backwards compatability in the future. Can you
> > think of a good reason *not* to do it?
> Nope. Does anyone object if I go ahead and do that s///, and then
> check it in? I'll even document it in the FCP spec.
can someone clarify for me who seems to have lost the mail, what we were
s///ing to, so i can change it in my local copy?
- fish
_______________________________________________
devl mailing list
devl at freenetproject.org
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
