fish <fish at bovine.artificial-stupidity.net> writes: > On 15 Dec 2002, Edgar Friendly wrote: > > > Ian Clarke <ian at freenetproject.org> writes: > > > My point is, all we need to do is a search-replace on this patch, and we > > > can *avoid* breaking backwards compatability in the future. Can you > > > think of a good reason *not* to do it? > > Nope. Does anyone object if I go ahead and do that s///, and then > > check it in? I'll even document it in the FCP spec. > > can someone clarify for me who seems to have lost the mail, what we were > s///ing to, so i can change it in my local copy? > > - fish
don't worry about it; it'll be a simple syntactic change. Since noone has objected yet, I'll take care of it when I get back in tonight. Thelema -- E-mail: thelema314 at swbell.net Raabu and Piisu GPG 1024D/36352AAB fpr:756D F615 B4F3 BFFC 02C7 84B7 D8D7 6ECE 3635 2AAB _______________________________________________ devl mailing list devl at freenetproject.org http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
