On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 05:48:20PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > I disagree. The information "failed, retrying" is essentially the same as 
> > > "trying" - at least for the average user. Not even I care whether has 
> > > already been retried. I want to see it failed or succeeded (though I 
> > > prefer 
> > > succeeded :).
> > It is relevant if you are trying to estimate how far it has got. Isn't
> > it?
> 
> It would give the user more accurate information about what is 
> happening and therefore give them a better ability to determine 
> progress, however the question is whether a newbie a) would understand 
Your scheme requires the newbie to learn or figure out that the yellow
section is redundant, and the only clue they get is the color. This is
no different. If they are quite clearly shades of the same color, where
is the harm?
> or b) cares about that kind of detail.
> 
> I say no.  If someone wants that kind of detail, let them use the expert 
> view.
What if the expert wants a compact view?
> 
> Ian.
> 
> -- 
> Ian Clarke                ian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com]
> Latest Project                                 http://cematics.com/kanzi
> Personal Homepage                                     http://locut.us/

-- 
Matthew Toseland
toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
amphibian at users.sourceforge.net
Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker.
Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/1/03
http://freenetproject.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021220/987f0f2f/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to