On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 03:11:25PM -0500, Tavin Cole wrote: > I'm arguing for the simplification of the interface.
It's not really a simplification but a change - you want Buckets to be abstractions of fixed size buffers rather than files. > P.S. counting bytes isn't a big deal but if it's unnecessary, why do it? Counting bytes adds a bit of code complication, but negligable runtime cost. So it makes more sense to implement it in the bucket (meaning it may be run redundantly) then to leave it to the user (meaning that the implementation may redundantly duplicated). I think it is worth having just to make the interface more flexible (IIRC the CLI client uses it for the progress indicator for example). -- Oskar Sandberg oskar at freenetproject.org _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
