On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 05:12:50PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> On Monday 04 February 2002 16:28, Tavin wrote:
> > > Lets put this issue on hold until AFTER, the new DataStore code is
> > > debugged.
> > >
> > > In the mean time, do whatever you like internally but don't hijack the
> > > Bucket/BucketFactory symbols.
> >
> > It's already done, and has been since last summer, so don't start
> > complaining now.  And you can't claim I've hijacked BucketFactory, only
> > that it was named wrong.
> I am not complaining or accusing you of hijacking (bet Echelon just spooled 
> this message off to a big HD somewhere  ;-) ) just politely pointing out some 
> inconsistencies and requesting that you don't "fix"  the working 
> Bucket/BucketFactory implementations that have the old semantics without 
> further discussion (later).

Heh.  Well the issue did need to be addressed sooner or later.  I guess
later.  Just do me a favor and mull over the question of whether the old
semantics are really useful :)

-tc

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to