On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 10:18:48AM +0100, Nico Galoppo wrote: > --* Oskar Sandberg (Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 12:35:41AM +0100) *-- > > > I would be the first to admit that Freenet does not offer real > > anonymity. I have never claimed it does. But trying to use a mixnet as a > > transport would not be the right way to try to make Freenet anonymous - > > you are much better off using the existing nodes to do a number of onion > > routed steps before you start Key routing. The amount of traffic that is > > currently being seen between Freenet nodes ought to be a wet dream for > > anybody wishing to hide anonymous transactions. > > At which layer would the onion prerouted steps be coded in your view? As > opposed to the solution I proposed.
Message. But I won't accept any implementation of this into the code at the moment. In six months to a year maybe. <> -- Oskar Sandberg oskar at freenetproject.org _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
