Oskar Sandberg wrote: > Build 608 will stop your node from taking part in this
I hope we see the fix on next 5xx release too. > to see if I am being overly strict or missing cases I would be happy. No check for 127.x.y.z; x,y,z >= 0? How about multicast ranges? Also it seems that some networks do not route addresses ending in .0 and .255 (even when the addresses belong in larger classes). > question is whether we should try to resolve DNS addresses to see if > they are real. IMO it would only create unnecessary traffic to nameservers. _______________________________________________ devl mailing list devl at freenetproject.org http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
