On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 10:04:59AM +0200, Marco A. Calamari wrote: > Consider this; when all agree that the objective is to release > Freenet to the general public, you seriously said that a > well-behaving windows installer was unimportant for the relase.
No, I said that the Windows installer shouldn't delay the release, and that it would be absolutely ridiculous if it did. > When trying to have a general agreement on the (revolutionary) > fact to have a release date for Freenet, you seriusly decided for an > overall scheduling of 5 days for the whole thing. No, actually I pointed out the need for a release date, and - having checked with Matthew Toseland first, suggested Wednesday. Since then, Oskar and Matthew discovered some significant bugs which had to be fixed, so we agreed on next Monday instead. Please don't be so presumptuously critical when you don't know all the facts. Ian. -- Ian Clarke ian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com] Latest Project http://cematics.com/kanzi Personal Homepage http://locut.us/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021021/9cc42c2d/attachment.pgp>
