Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> writes: > Doesn't matter. We can't link to edition sites because people may be > running the same build of 0.5 for months or more.
So? The linked-to page will stay the same, but this is not necessarily a bad thing, especially for informative sites that don't need to change too often. Most edition sites have activelinks into the future as well. And I'm still of the opinion that people who have used freenet for months will no longer depend on the links on the gateway page -- it's mainly there for newbies. fish at bovine.artificial-stupidity.net writes: > also an edition site, hence can't be. Bah. > not to metnion that this must be some defition of 'easier' that I > was previously unaware ;) Maybe "easy" as in "cool", respectively "chill out, watch Boobietown and hear Brainiac while-u-wait ... and in 23 hours there's another DBR rollover anyway" -- Robbe -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.ng Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021024/25e6449d/attachment.pgp>
