> > > From: > fish <fish at bovine.artificial-stupidity.net> > Date: > Tue, 29 Oct 2002 07:55:37 +1100 (EST) > > >On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > >>>I don't think that the solution to the network overloading is through >>>more effective throttling though. An overloaded Freenet does not decay >>>gracefully it would seem. A more preferable failure mode would be longer >>>waits rather then 99.9% RNFs. >>> >>> >>Yes. I'm not getting that many RNFs though... maybe it's gotten worse. >> >> > >I'm still managing to retrieve data okay... I'm only getting about 50% >RNF's on retrieval, maybe even less. Inserting does seem to be the >killer, tho. I can't even insert at HTL=5 :-p > > - fish > >
Are you including sites that you have visited that were already cached on your local node? I have had good success with site that I had visited previously but very close to zero success on sites that I hadn't yet seen or keys that did not exist. For non-existent keys I would have expected lots of DNFs but all I got were lots of RNFs. Mike _______________________________________________ devl mailing list devl at freenetproject.org http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
