Dave Hooper schrieb: > > > > > Could somebody PLEASE FIX THE FUCKING WIDNOWS SHIT PLEASE? > > > > > > Yeh could someone PLEASE GIVE ME A FUCKING BUG REPORT PLEASE? > > > > Could someone READ THE FUCKING BUG REPORTS PLEASE? > > My reference was to 'The Fucking Windows Shit'.
So was mine. If you shout, I shout back. > Which bug(s) is/are referred to as The Fucking Windows Shit (or is > that just the general impression of all of the Windows support software?) For most linux users that might be the case. > Did you test it > after I made the change? I tested it after you mailed me a version and I told you by mail Message-ID: <3E5BCAF4.E3536074 at gmx.de> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 20:58:44 +0100 From: Michael Schierl <schierlm-pub...@gmx.de> To: Dave Hooper <dave at beermex.com> Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Re: Updated freenet.exe that it did not help. Then there was no further reply from you. However, i fetched new freenet.exe with every new build. (as the updater does so.) So I decided not to answer again as you don't seem to have time/$whatever. > I saw your proposed solution but I didn't like it - it smacks too much of > working around Microsoft's problems which isn't really the issue here. okay, if javaw does not make problems on 2k, it's no prob. And I thought all that change was cuz javaw did rubbish on 2k. > Did you try the latest freenet.exe yet (I think I announced it yesterday)? > Did you offer constructive advice over whether that works for you or not? I read your announcement after the message i replied. the latest version works for me. mihi btw: could you change the installer that it does not put a new freenet link to the startup folder whenever I do node update. Less than 20% of my windows boots i'm connected to the net, so it's more work for me to close it in 80% of the cases (a JVM needs quite some RAM) than starting it in 20%. thx. _______________________________________________ devl mailing list devl at freenetproject.org http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
