Matthew Li (matthewli at iprimus.com.au) wrote: > use the suggest a faw button > and then an admin will have to approve it
I'd laugh, but that's too pathetic to deserve even that much attention. Rather than watch Freenet continue its historical tradition of having an officially linked FAQ that sucks very large rocks, would someone who has administrative privileges please offer euthanasia to those two "FAQ" links on the front page? They can be replaced now that I've combined them into one FAQ: http://freenetproject.org/tiki-index.php?page=FAQ This is also linked from the Documentation page, since I have permission to modify *that* one. By the way, what does it mean when the "edit" button at the bottom of the Tiki pages turns red? Is it sore because I've been clicking it so often? -- Greg Wooledge | "Truth belongs to everybody." greg at wooledge.org | - The Red Hot Chili Peppers http://wooledge.org/~greg/ | -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 187 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030307/c054784b/attachment.pgp>
