On Sat, May 03, 2003 at 01:58:01PM -0400, Edward J. Huff wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-05-03 at 13:34, Edward J. Huff wrote:
> > On Sat, 2003-05-03 at 12:56, Mark J Roberts wrote:
> > > If you entangle your file with my illegal document, which is later
> > > suppressed, you have nobody to blame but yourself when your file
> > > must be reinserted. It's sort of like announcing that you intend to
> > > jump off a cliff unless I give you a million dollars. I have no
> > > legal obligation to keep you from jumping.
> 
> To amplify further, when you start inserting your illegal
> document, what you insert is two new random files.  Some time
> later, you insert a formula for your document into a circulating
> stream of formulas.  Meanwhile, the random bits you inserted
> may well be used in the formula for other documents.

"a circulating stream of formulas" ? What does this even mean?
> 
> One of the files is actually random.  The other is indistinguishable
> from being random.  No one can tell which is which.  They can
> only produce the document when combined with other files according
> to a formula which includes encryption keys.  Meanwhile, they
> can produce other documents when used with other formulas.
> 
> So suppression has to be aimed at the very small formula instead
> of at the large random files.  But distributing very small
> files is a lot easier, and the big files can be routed efficiently
> to specialized nodes.  Redundant storage is accomplished by
> storing the same file under different formulas, and it is
> never necessary to store a particular file anywhere but
> at its one specialized node.  Loss of a node does not cause
> loss of content (even though there is only one permanent copy
> of any given file) because the content can be reconstructed
> from many different sets of files.

We already have redundant storage for the _same_ key... however there
may be a possibility of effectively blocking a key, maybe, by installing
blocks on a large fraction of nodes...
> 
> > 
> > The idea is your illegal document would have been entangled
> > with other legal documents. [...]
> 
> -- Ed Huff
> 
_______________________________________________
devl mailing list
devl at freenetproject.org
http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to