Would probably confuse the client... Can you test this?
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 02:43:42PM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > >You can't have a 206 in response to a request that didn't ask for a > >byterange: > > > Damn. I suppose you could try to trick the client into sending a range > request by sending a 416 (requested range not satisfiable) in response > to the original request, specifying the range that the client should > request... but that's getting really ugly. > > Michael -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20050901/706077ad/attachment.pgp>
