On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 11:31:20AM +0200, Alex R. Mosteo wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: > >On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 06:02:13PM +0200, Alex R. Mosteo wrote: > > > >>>You do, however, the user will assume it is stalled and cancel it, since > >>>it won't return any data at all for minutes to hours on end. > >> > >>Well, it's a matter of advertising that freenet downloads can seem > >>stalled for long times, just like now a long time for node integration > >>is expected for new nodes. > > > > > >People don't read READMEs. Actually, people don't read. > > That's unfair.
Perhaps, but in any case, if we use the web browser interface, we need to make it behave consistently with that. > > >>But I wonder if there are browser-side timeouts. > > > >Yes. Of course there are. > > Nevermind then. -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20050902/fccf00bb/attachment.pgp>
