On Thursday 01 June 2006 10:11, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> The easiest way to "prevent" such harmfull behaviour would be to have
> some kind of authorization scheme when doing "potential" harmfull
> operations ... that would preclude any kind of automation... And
> according to Ian, that's not a goal we should try to achieve ;)
We could let the user confirm deletions so that nobody can delete
connections from the outside... but that doesn't help against
harvesting.
> NextGen$
> (Convinced too that the reference auto-adder is EVIL!)
David (is with toad & NextGen$ on the auto-adder issue)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20060601/039850a7/attachment.pgp>
