On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 10:19:05AM +0200, David 'Bombe' Roden wrote: > On Thursday 01 June 2006 10:11, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > > The easiest way to "prevent" such harmfull behaviour would be to have > > some kind of authorization scheme when doing "potential" harmfull > > operations ... that would preclude any kind of automation... And > > according to Ian, that's not a goal we should try to achieve ;) > > We could let the user confirm deletions so that nobody can delete > connections from the outside... but that doesn't help against > harvesting.
Currently anything dangerous needs a POST form to be submitted. > > > NextGen$ > > (Convinced too that the reference auto-adder is EVIL!) > > David (is with toad & NextGen$ on the auto-adder issue) Actually I've largely recanted. I always said that we would *eventually* need an FCP interface to connection add/remove. The question is, when do we need it? Soon, perhaps, then we can start working on plugins. -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20060601/df6b92ac/attachment.pgp>
