On 6/19/06, freenetwork at web.de <freenetwork at web.de> wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >There has been some discussion about what size activelinks should be in
> >freenet.7
> >Read about it:
> >http://archives.freenetproject.org/thread/20060607.193351.af1b5a82.en.html
> >
> >It is unsure is we are able to change the common activelink size in freenet
> >.7 , but if we want to change it, what should it become.
> >
> >I am personally in favor of 108 x 36, because it's better scalable and
> >because the size is not TOO simillar to the old 95 x 32. If the difference
> >is very small, people will not notice it and we probably won't get 1
> >standard.
> >
> >Current proposols:
>
>
> 95 x 32 (the old one)
> 96 x 32 (/2, /4, /8, /16, /32) (ratio 96/32=3)
> 96 x 36 (/2, /3, /4, /6, /12)
> 108 x 36 (/2, /3, /4, /6, /9, /12, /18, /36) (ratio 108/36=3)
>
>
>
>
> 108 x 36 has my vote
>
If it scale properly it got my vote.
