Ruud Javi wrote: > Hi all, > > There has been some discussion about what size activelinks should be in > freenet.7 > Read about it: > http://archives.freenetproject.org/thread/20060607.193351.af1b5a82.en.html > > It is unsure is we are able to change the common activelink size in > freenet .7 , but if we want to change it, what should it become. > > I am personally in favor of 108 x 36, because it's better scalable and > because the size is not TOO simillar to the old 95 x 32. If the > difference is very small, people will not notice it and we probably > won't get 1 standard. > > Current proposols: > 95 x 32 (the old one) > 96 x 32 (/2, /4 possible) (ratio 96/32=3) > 96 x 36 (/2, /3, /4 possible) > 108 x 36 (/2, /3, /4, /6, /9, /12) (ratio 108/36=3)
I'm moving all my freesites to 108x36 starting with next issues. -- Hi! I am a .SIG virus! Copy me to your SIG so that I can spread! http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast http://www.whengendarmesleeps.org/ When Gendarme Sleeps, Anarchy's Zine of Poetry ======================== "None of us are free until all of us are free." ~ Mihail Bakunin
