On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 10:00:27PM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Hmmm, okay. Well will it - either the add-to-least-full-bucket or > > add-to-most-full-non-full-bucket be fair if we only take into account > > the number of tokens available, and not the queued/running requests? > > I don't see why not - we're still controlling the number of requests > each peer can send us via the token buckets.
And if they don't finish, we won't relay tokens to the incoming peers. Ok. > > Cheers, > Michael -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20060623/cfe92f90/attachment.pgp>
