GASP kp. If you had checked it, you would see it was adults in some light bondage gear aka kinky porn.
On 10/3/06, toad <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > We should add some more index sites. > Currently we only have the Darknet Index: > USK at > PFeLTa1si2Ml5sDeUy7eDhPso6TPdmw-2gWfQ4Jg02w,3ocfrqgUMVWA2PeorZx40TW0c-FiIOL-TWKQHoDbVdE,AQABAAE/Index/40/index.html > > The problem with this is it hasn't been updated in ages. > > There is the public index (which is always up to date, it seems), but > IMHO it would be unwise to link to something which is globally writable; > somebody may replace it with a redirect to the goat man, or worse, in the > middle of us being /.ed or doing a major release. > USK at > 60I8H8HinpgZSOuTSD66AVlIFAy-xsppFr0YCzCar7c,NzdivUGCGOdlgngOGRbbKDNfSCnjI0FXjHLzJM4xkJ4,AQABAAE/index/83/ > > Then there is Indicia. This has activelinks, but offensive activelinks > are censored. It has descriptions for every site, although some of them > are ambiguous, and it is categorised. And it's updated regularly. A first > time user browsing Indicia will only run into porn if they want it, and > as far as I can see there is no outrageous child porn at the moment, and > even if there was it would almost certainly be labelled properly. > > USK at > c55vMxUl-T-lD3nv0iOaXF%7eG1hnY6pOMRbzZSwACMmY%2cyd8%7euwUmGm164-ipStoiBOJVjkbbYXJMlD%7eH5ftPxIA%2cAQABAAE/Indicia/31/ > > And there is Another Index. This is uncensored, no pictures, with no > manual descriptions, although it may be manually categorised. The > problem is that on the Porn section it links to a site called "kp", > without explaining the (sadly well-known amongst freenet users) acronym. > > USK at > e4TEIN5l1nkn6kjl63XBgYTYobmwGvtnyK2YW0b0ajo,hv-2~OfetXkb0FhDuPxorWIf0wXeZKPEfdIhwyh-mhk,AQABAAE/AnotherIndex/27/ > > Which of these should we put on our homepage? Ian has stated that our > policy must be to link to those indexes which will best help users to > find content, without prejudice to the nature of that content. Indicia > scores very high on this count, by virtue of having descriptions. IMHO > another, related requirement we should impose is that newbies won't run > into child porn without being warned about it at some stage. > > So should we include AnotherIndex, or not? If we do, should we include a > warning that it doesn't provide descriptions and there may be > objectionable content? If we're going to put warnings on, should we > include the Public Index as well? > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFFIoHdA9rUluQ9pFARAv5bAJwONWYpvYDFr1FPdjoCdz9IbETN0ACghtld > Lq/0OdGdzXlO9fE7oCQooaw= > =OND7 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > > -- I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. - Voltaire Those who would give up Liberty, to purchase temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin
