On Wednesday 12 December 2007 10:41, freenetwork at web.de wrote:
> Well. For my personal taste it is necessary to be technical to a degree.
> To propose to use "Freenet" for everything is not correct.
>
> There is
> - the "Freenet Project" - the overall project, just like "Mozilla
Firefox", "Microsoft Windows", etc.
> - the "Freenet" - the network and it's structure - like "the Internet"
> - the "Freenet", again - as the complete concept how the network shall work
> - the "node" - a more theoretical descrition of a participant, a
singe "point", of and within the network
> - the node's implementation "FRED" ("Freenet REference Daemon") - the java
program within the .jar, that, when run, provides functionalies of a node
> - the node's HTTP-user interface "FProxy" - to browse freesites, enter other
node/FRED references, see statistics, etc.
>
> and you want to smush everything together to a single term "Freenet" ?!!
No, in this case it is being used as "the application Freenet", which is quite
specific and reasonably obvious to the user.
>
> Like "I downloaded teh Internet" ;)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20071212/e074fefb/attachment.pgp>
